<p>The journal’s policies say they use a statistical reviewer “when appropriate” - I am sceptical but pledge to read the full article before I comment - we can criticize Yahoo for its summary, but perhaps the article itself contains the caveats we are easily coming up with. It seems premature to criticize the journal, the article, or the authors. (We could probably design a great experiment that would test the hypothesis of interest, but it would be pretty hard to conduct the study!)</p>
<p>[Heldref</a> Publications - Journal of American College Health](<a href=“http://www.heldref.org/pubs/jach/manuscripts.html]Heldref”>http://www.heldref.org/pubs/jach/manuscripts.html)</p>