<p>Having read the article about the paper, but not the paper itself, I can’t conclude the methodology is flawed. I think it likely the methodology is flawed-- there are a lot of statistical minefields in a study like that, and social scientists tend not to be able to navigate through them-- but I don’t know it’s flawed, and I don’t know how anyone else could know without having read the paper. </p>
<p>I want to see the cross-tabs.</p>