<p>
</p>
<p>I’d like to take a stab at this even though it’s been answered. </p>
<p>Although I’ve got ties to U-M, my views aren’t blind homerism. I went to a small liberal arts school for my undergrad, and thought that was a superior environment in just about every way possible. I came to U-M as a grad student, and was mystified as to why anyone from outside Michigan would attend as an undergrad. </p>
<p>But over the past decade (and more!) I’ve learned more about U-M as prospective students, current students, and alums see it. My views have changed. U-M is not for everyone; it probably would not have been as good for me as a small school was. However, I see very few other places that can offer the combination that U-M does: prestige (yes we can debate “how much” endlessly), extraordinary depth and breadth, fun college town, a big-time athletic scene. I can name lots of places that offer some of those. There are few that offer all.</p>
<p>These things may not matter to everyone. But for the students who are seeking them, U-M is one of the few places in the U.S. where they can get those things in one package. I think that’s pretty remarkable. Berkeley can make the same boast–plus they kick our butts in weather. LOL.</p>
<p>This goes beyond the focus on reputation or prestige, of course. But it’s a unique combination.</p>