College Comparison XVII: Geographic Diversity

<p>FYI, Middlebury still doesn’t offer a Ling program. It is starting a ling minor in 2010.</p>

<p>I agree that UMich offers “the quintessential public college experience,” which is why I called it an “excellent public university.” Smaller classes and better counseling are, to me, much more important than D1 football (which is actual a personal drawback because I hate football). </p>

<p>dstark - I WANT to hear about UMich’s programs. I was just clearing up the misconception by other posters that I’m interested for my own sake; rather, I’m interested because I care about accurate information for its own sake.</p>

<p>Last admissions cycle, a TASPer turned down Stanford for UMich. Money was a factor, but so was fit. And I don’t demean or question his choice in the least. But I am interested in the “boring details.” (Alexandre–good point, I forgot about the small town. But intimate LAC, Michigan is not.)</p>

<p>

This sort of detail is what I was looking for. Though may I ask where the various disciplinary rankings come from? LACs generally don’t show up on graduate school rankings, yet that obviously does not make them worse academically for the 13 traditional liberal arts disciplines.</p>

<p>How does UMich’s endowment per student compare to its peer schools, using the $12B practical endowment number?</p>

<p>I’m so glad that I pushed in asking for detail about UMich; the answers I’ve gotten are rarely given in any other discussions of Michigan.</p>