I really appreciate you all taking the time to talk this through with me. It is very helpful, even if (especially if?) it’s confirming what we are already thinking.
@tk21769
“Few HS students have much exposure to linguistics. Unless your D is unusual in that respect, keep in mind that just because she enjoys learning foreign languages (and is good at it), she won’t necessarily enjoy the scientific study of language. An affinity for math, formal logic, or computer programming might be a better indicator than a knack for language-learning. It’s a very interesting field, though, and can lead to pretty good career opportunities.”
It is an interesting field, for sure. I am a speech-language pathologist, so I have some basic knowledge of linguistics. I’ve been trying hard to guide D and educate her about the field, without overloading or piling on expectations. It’s a tough balance. She has done some reading on her own, and she likes the VSauce videos on the subject. Their linguistics lessons tend to be pretty math-y. My D’s amazing and brilliant German tutor gave her some general linguistics assignments over the summer. We also have a long time friend who has worked as a linguist for the US government, and D has been able to chat with him. When D visited Tulane a few days ago, she got to sit in on three classes, one of them an upper-level linguistics class. The professor was kind enough to send D a link to the required reading for that day’s lesson ahead of time. D was able to follow the discussion and really enjoyed the class. So, overall, I think D knows what she’s getting into, as much as a 16 year old can. As I’d mentioned before, though, she is fascinated with the whole Cognitive Science spectrum, so she could branch off at some point to a related field. She is really enjoying the neuroscience that she’s learning about in her AP Bio and Psych classes right now. It’s exciting to think about all of the opportunities that she has.
Speaking of Tulane, even though she doesn’t feel it’s the right place for her, there are a lot of things she likes about that size/type of school, and she’d like to have some choices come decision time. I understand what you’re saying about the more selective schools not necessarily being the better schools for her. The Canadian schools are a long ways from home, though, both literally and figuratively. Rice and WashU are both within a day’s drive. D probably won’t need to be that close to home, but a lot can happen in a year, year and a half. I see too many stories here on CC about students who feel trapped at decision time and wish they had more options. Plus, the planned visits to Rice and WashU are with a long time trusted friend and academic peer. I think it will be good for both D and her friend, so they can process everything together.
@Consolation Regarding the Smith/consortium option: D and I looked pretty closely at the Quaker consortium awhile back, as Bryn Mawr offers merit scholarships and Swarthmore and Penn (obviously) cover the linguistics bases. I keep reminding her of the option, and she keeps saying no. The LAC lifestyle does not seem to be for her.
And thank you for sharing about UBC. I have heard the commuter school knock before. D doesn’t think that would be as much of a problem for her, as she’d be fine with a quiet, study-friendly campus, and she is looking forward to living independently and being a commuter herself.
Overall, McGill and Toronto are looking like the best options, eh? (Sorry. Running theme in our house these days.) D and I took our first trip to Montreal, at her request, right after her freshman year. She told me then, “Mom, we don’t need to visit any other schools. McGill is perfect for me.” About a dozen college visits and several gray hairs later, she may have been right!