<p>Sorry to hear about the problems, C43.</p>
<p>Just to be clear, I am not suggesting that it is a bad idea to learn something about business. I do think that taking a course in accounting would be useful for nearly everyone (as painful as some might find it) as we are all going to be working for or working with organizations that have to take in money and spend it and monitor the spending, whether businesses, non-profits, governments, schools, etc. I just haven’t seen many business majors as great performers. I’m sure that some, like you Deborah T, break my stereotype. [I can think of one off the top of my head]. It’s a numbers thing. </p>
<p>spectrum2, I think philosophy is fine. I’d generally spice it up with something that helps with short-term employment (data analysis, writing, speaking, see below for further thoughts). Things I’d put into the ideal undergraduate education in terms of preparation for long-term as opposed to short-term employment prospects:</p>
<p>Statistics with an emphasis on data analysis and decision-making under uncertainty.
Some science – Americans are woefully ignorant about science and say, vote for and do stupid things as a result.
Computer programming, with emphasis on something like c++ and or Java rather than something like html. I’m looking for the kid to learn a kind of structured logic (in line with the basic theme: learning how to think).
Anything that teaches them to write.
I think neuroscience and genetics are getting very interesting and enlightening subjects like the evolution of human behavior.
I personally doubt that most undergraduate courses in marketing, sales or PR or entrepreneurship are useful – less likely to teach thinking – even though I think that becoming an entrepreneur is both important to the American economy and a potentially satisfying career and there is a lot to being good at marketing, sales or PR.
Something that teaches kids to express themselves effectively (public speaking or debate) – need not be learned in a course although it could be.
Some basic economics, if only so people can be semi-informed voters.
Probably social psychology – lots of good stuff in there about life in general.</p>
<p>spectrum2, my experience is somewhat idiosyncratic. I’ve never worked for a large company. I started my career at a university as a professor and then went to work for a small investment bank and then an investment firm, and then started a consulting firm and an investment firm. I have a background in mathematical fields but have studied and draw on lots of social science (psychology, economics, political science). I want everyone to be smart and creative and proactively solve problems (including admins); some of the positions require good speaking and presentation skills. My consulting firm’s clients include lots of large, well-known global companies so I have a fair understanding of what goes on there at somewhat senior levels, though I don’t know a lot about how they do hiring right at the entry level. I do see the backgrounds of the mid- to senior-level people we work with. We’re partnering now with one of the major strategy consulting firms on a project and I was getting an interesting tutorial from them on how they do hiring at the undergrad and MBA levels. I know a lot less generally about how small firms hire. It is possibly there that people would need immediate impact, which should advantage undergrad business majors, but I’d guess the employers would focus on people with a some real work experience or meaningful internships.</p>
<p>I think if your son studies math and anything else (economics, business, psychology, biology, neuroscience, geology, programming, …), he will be employable right out of the box. Maybe not at some large organizations like P&G but I’d guess at others like Shell. Also at investment firms, consulting firms, software firms, or possibly pharma/biotech. Even though most Americans are fairly unknowledgeable about math (at best, the stopped at calculus), they pretty much know that you have to be smart to do it. Then, if you know anything else that they can see as an interest in practical things and look like someone who has social skills, the combination makes you a good candidate for at least certain kinds of jobs. People who know how to analyze data thoughtfully and explain what they’ve learned in writing and presentations will probably not be lacking employment. [By the way, you can get there from lots of fields]. Long answer to a short question, sorry.</p>