<p>You should really consider OU. They have a really, really great petE program. They are highly recruited in oil. OOS can be cheaper at OU than in state is at the UCs</p>
<p>^But it’s OU…how much worse can you go?</p>
<p>You don’t have to be a petroleum engineer. Big Oil hires more ChE as well as other engineers.</p>
<p>
Some of my geology undergrads have gotten jobs with oil companies. They’re doing more of the grunt work than someone with a MS would, but they’re paid well enough. I can’t comment on engineering.</p>
<p>If you want to go to school in a city, and if you’re a NMSF, you could get a full ride at the University of Houston. It’s not as prestigious as UT, but much cheaper OOS, and the energy companies recruit there.</p>
<p>UT, A&M, OU, Colorado School of Mines, Houston, Wyoming</p>
<p>University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. It’s one of the very best chemical engineering schools in the country, and out-of-state tuition is so cheap that it’s actually less expensive for a California resident to attend as an OOS student than UC-Berkeley or UCLA at in-state rates.</p>
<p>Ken Kruger, President of ExxonMobil Production Company which is responsible for all of that company’s global oil and gas production, is a UMN alum, as was former ExxonMobil CEO Lee Raymond. Kruger is quoted on the UMN website about their hiring practices:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Translation: you don’t need to go to school in the oil patch to get a job with an oil and gas company, because when they’re recruiting they’re going to go for quality, not geography. </p>
<p>That’s echoed by UMN alum and Schlumberger employee Marissa Ebert who spent 3 years as a Schlumberger recruiter:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a href=“http://cse.umn.edu/admin/comm/features/2012_2_20_Invent_future_togeth.php[/url]”>http://cse.umn.edu/admin/comm/features/2012_2_20_Invent_future_togeth.php</a></p>