<p>I normally wouldn’t get involved in a public discussion on a controversial subject, but I just felt that I had to weigh in with my thoughts on the inappropriateness of UVA’s information session.</p>
<p>I think what is missing from this discussion is the recognition that a student’s visit to a campus is generally the student’s first formal introduction to an institution. The admission department is acting on behalf of the institution to present itself to prospective members of the community. The INSTITUTION is in effect saying, “Hello. This is who we are. Please look around and see if this is who you are, too. If it is, we invite you to apply to become a part of our community, and more important, to become a part of our institution.”</p>
<p>It should be obvious that the institution communicates not only through the words used in the information session but through the setting in which the words are delivered. Campus architecture often communicates an august sense of tradition, continuity and excellence. A well designed religious space is consciously designed to communicate a spiritual message. In traditional architecture of Christian churches and chapels, the combination of the shape of the building, the layout of pews and sanctuary, the iconography in the artwork all work together to heighten the sense of ceremony and ritual and to communicate a specifically Christian message. Religious buildings are often so moving precisely because of this ability to communicate a spiritual message.</p>
<p>As all of the posts in this thread show, the student’s introduction to a college is a highly charged moment when symbols are especially important. Students are consciously looking for symbols and talismans that might communicate something about the nature of the community. It seems obvious to me that when an institution chooses to introduce itself to prospective members of the community in a ceremonial space that is designed to communicate a Christian message, at least some of the prospective members will receive the message – whether consciously or unconsciously – that this is, in some important way, a Christian institution. In my view, this message will not necessarily be overcome by a mere disclaimer by the admission’s office rep that this is now a secular space and, besides, this is the only place available for this important ritual.</p>
<p>An institution’s introduction in such a space will not equally welcoming to all faiths (or to those of no faith at all). The space may have been repurposed for secular uses, but it is still a sacred space that is designed to communicate a spiritual message. </p>
<p>My point is this: The information session is precisely the moment when the institution is saying: “This is who we are.” The chapel setting communicates: “This is a Christian place.” Although I understand the logistical difficulties that the admissions office was faced with, I believe that it is inappropriate for a public institution to be communicating those two messages simultaneously, especially when the non-Christian members of the community are likely to be in the minority. I believe that the administration should have worked a bit harder to find a place to introduce the institution that would be equally welcoming to all prospective members, no matter what their faith, and that would more effectively communicate the institution’s public mission.</p>
<p>Symbols and rituals are important, and colleges should be cognizant of the messages that they may be sending, albeit unintentionally. (I have not visited UVA and have never been to the chapel. My thoughts are based solely on what I read in this forum.)</p>