<p>The phenomenom is that so many literary works are interpreted differently depending on each and every specific word that is used in the writing.</p>
<p>i had the experimental CR as well so I’m not sure if this short passage was in the counted section…but i think the other passage was about Spanish and how it impacts culture and everyone will be speaking it in the future</p>
<p>Yes, come to think of it, I recall reading about Spanish.</p>
<p>For the antique dog, the light heartedness that showed they didn’t value it, that answer was they treated it so clumsily it showed they didn’t value it right?</p>
<p>Oh yeah, I had that spanish one too. It must have been with the Indian collumnist one.</p>
<p>i veryyy vaguely remember that</p>
<p>Spanish passage, there was a question about the impact of Spanish people or something.</p>
<p>I think I put “shift in language use” or something like that? Is that wrong?</p>
<p>LessThanSamii: yup, something along those lines…</p>
<p>Ok because I remembered clumsily being in my answer. Thanks!</p>
<p>“having his work read aloud was significant but discomforting”</p>
<p>I strongly felt that the author was actually relieved when he told the audience his works. there was another choice that felt better, something about meaningfulness (to him, and the second part was, but not to his audience)…</p>
<p>But he wasn’t comfortable. He stated that he felt a great deal of anxiety sharing his ideas, especially about different races and religions, with other people. However, it was significant because it was a new experience for him, because he had previously always kept his stories in his mind.</p>
<p>“pulp = inferior form of lit”</p>
<p>I don’t think this is right. I think pulp means sensationalistic.</p>
<p>which passages were in the exper. cr section?</p>
<p>Wasn’t pulp refering to how he was criticizing violent comics?</p>
<p>I can’t remember exactly what form of media he was criticizing, but I do know that one of the options was about sensationalism, so I think that’s the correct one, not the one about inferior literature.</p>
<p>“Inferior form of literature” was CORRECT. </p>
<p>The reason the “sensational” answer was wrong was because it said “sensational TV shows” or something to that effect, when the author was actually talking about comics, not TV.</p>
<p>does anyone remember if the pervasive phenomenon was A for the answer choices?</p>
<p>and does everyone agree for the dinosaur passage that it’s beneficial and important?</p>
<p>@LessThanSamii: Yes, I’m pretty sure the choice about not valuing was correct.</p>
<p>I’m almost positive that “inferior genre of literature” was the correct choice. :)</p>
<p>I didn’t put “pervasive phenomenon”…I put “impact of a practice,” but I don’t know if it’s wrong. On the consolidated list “redundancy” and “qualifiers” were also listed…no one seems to know the right answer for that one.</p>
<p>I did put “beneficial and important” for the dinosaur passage though, and it’s on the consolidated list.</p>
<p>^ me too. i put “impact of a practice” for the pervasive phenom one. Anyone care to explain why that’s wrong?</p>
<p>@ ichiruki</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure the answer was not “significant but discomforting”, I believe the answer was something like “it was not relevant to all the listeners”. </p>
<p>Anyone care to second this?</p>