<p>“I would love to see the jury text their verdict to the court.”</p>
<p>lol…</p>
<p>Yes, they should dim the courtroom lights, send the verdict by text, and then have it displayed onto a big screen.</p>
<p>“I would love to see the jury text their verdict to the court.”</p>
<p>lol…</p>
<p>Yes, they should dim the courtroom lights, send the verdict by text, and then have it displayed onto a big screen.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Possibilities also include loving her dad so much that she doesn’t care whether he did right or wrong or bizarrely felt the blame should be all on the victim(s). </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>If the daughter and/or her brother have no sense of responsibility, had issues with their mother, and/or felt their mother “betrayed” the family bizarrely by uttering the shooting not justified remark heard by deputy, I can easily see how they may decide to refuse to take any responsibility for her care. </p>
<p>In such cases, barring some law compelling them to do so, there may be nothing to compel them beyond community/family/religious pressures to get them to step up if this becomes necessary. </p>
<p>How about they dim the lights, text the verdict and munch on popcorn?</p>
<p>"If the daughter and/or her brother have no sense of responsibility, had issues with their mother, and/or felt their mother “betrayed” the family bizarrely by uttering the shooting not justified remark heard by deputy, I can easily see how they may decide to refuse to take any responsibility for her care.</p>
<p>In such cases, barring some law compelling them to do so, there may be nothing to compel them beyond community/family/religious pressures to get them to step up if this becomes necessary."</p>
<p>Right.</p>
<p>and if the mom gets wind of that, then her kids’ opinions about what she should do should become irrelevant. </p>
<p>I hope that this elderly lady has some level-headed siblings or friends of her own who will advise her to protect herself if it looks like her kids and her H are going to leave her “high and dry.” </p>
<p>This woman needs some pragmatic advice. I don’t know how his attys would be in a situation like this, but I don’t think that they’re advising him to “save money/assets/home for your wife.” But, maybe attys do??? I’m guessing not. </p>
<p>I agree that there are relatives (her kids) that may think she betrayed her H by immediately saying that the shooting wasn’t justified…but those “immediate utterances” seem to always have a LOT of power in court cases because they’re believed to be very true remarks. </p>
<p>Uh oh. More testimony. VERY damning
Surveillance video from the theater will be released tomorrow.
<a href=“Theater shooting witnesses say popcorn flew and gun went off”>http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/criminal/judge-surveillance-video-showing-wesley-chapel-movie-theater-shooting/2164252</a></p>
<p>YET, the judge is considering bail?? Maybe he would stay with his daughter and not his wife. <a href=“Florida judge considering bail for retired police officer accused in deadly movie theater shooting – New York Daily News”>http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/judge-considers-bail-movie-theater-shooting-article-1.1603284</a></p>
<p>"“I’ll teach you to throw popcorn at me,”"</p>
<p>Oh wow. If people heard him say “popcorn” then the defense falls apart.</p>
<p>“YET, the judge is considering bail?? Maybe he would stay with his daughter and not his wife.”</p>
<p>Right. I can’t imagine how he’ll taunt her for saying those words. </p>
<p>That said, the hearing is probably routine and likely (hopefully) won’t result in release on bail. </p>
<p>Instead of making up outlandish stories about the possible relationship between the family members of the shooter, lets look at today’s testimony and get information about their living arrangement first hand. What a concept ;
</p>
<p>Read more: <a href=“Florida judge considering bail for retired police officer accused in deadly movie theater shooting – New York Daily News”>Florida judge considering bail for retired police officer accused in deadly movie theater shooting – New York Daily News;
<p>reworded a sentence</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>mom2ck,</p>
<p>He or his kids may try to raise funds through kickstarter and appeal to his being a retired cop who was somehow fearful for his life. Considering his retired cop status, there’s likely going to be plenty of law enforcement folks and sympathizers who will probably donate from around the US and possibly even the world. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>AKA: How dare you disrespect mah authoritah! I’ll learn ya right now!</p>
<p>It’s the level of indignation I’d expect from those with excessive perceived entitlements to respect. </p>
<p>Such as telling random folks in public what to do without the status/legal standing to do so or feeling as if someone committed Lèse-majesté if a kernel of popcorn is tossed/falls on his majestic personage. </p>
<p>This guy gives retired military and retired police/security officers a very bad name. Much more likely they will steer very clear of him. </p>
<p>“Shaw told the court that she and her family are prepared to put the Reeves’ home up as collateral for the bond. It’s worth about $186,000, Shaw said. She also said the family has access to a $30,000 home equity line and about $22,000 in cash.”</p>
<p>Well, it’s very easy for her to say what “the family” is prepared to do. It’s not her money and she’s not elderly. And, although the family may seem somewhat united right now, these things often turn ugly. Any one of them with half a brain is going to be (wrongly) annoyed at the mom at some point for having said those words. The mom’s words and the deputy’s testimony about the shooter using the word “popcorn” is so very damaging to this case. </p>
<p>This isn’t like a Florida Casey Anthony case. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’m not sure how much stock his former military status would be given considering it seems he served a short period in relative peacetime from 1961 till 63* as seen here:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2014/01/fla_retired_officer_curtis_ree.html”>http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2014/01/fla_retired_officer_curtis_ree.html</a></p>
<p>It sounds as if he volunteered for submarines as a different more prestigious way of fulfilling his military obligation as all 18-26 year old men were liable for the peacetime draft in that period unless given some sort of exemption. </p>
<p>However, there may be enough law enforcement folks and sympathizers who felt the shooter was somehow justified for a possible kickstarter campaign to get some donations to fund defense costs. </p>
<ul>
<li>Unless his submarine was stationed in the Florida vicinity during the Cuban Missile crisis.<br></li>
</ul>
<p>
</p>
<p>I know it’s not NYC, but if the criminal case drags on and/or they need to defend against a long civil case as well, most of that could be gobbled by defense legal costs/fees. </p>
<p>As Groucho would say, thats the most ridiculous thing I evah hoid.</p>
<p>One good thing, if he was enlisted and not an officer, he doesn’t have USAA insurance. (They changed the rules to allow enlisted to join USAA in about 2008-9. Doubt he joined.)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’m not so sure it’s only for officers as shown here:</p>
<p><a href=“Enable Cookies | USAA | USAA”>Enable Cookies | USAA | USAA;
<p>Is there something I overlooked, here? </p>
<p>I figured you would make a crack, so I clarified the change in their policy. We have USAA. Have had it for decades. Do you?
How many of your cousins served in the US military?</p>
<p>Duplicated the post. Weird.</p>
<p>But, that said, in addition to adding the clarification on the USAA policy change (before you posted your crack) I did also ask you to please give it a rest. Can you speak from PERSONAL experience how USAA works and the services they offer? If not- please- put a cork in it. </p>
<p>It would have been a cruel turn of events if that guy was a USAA member. SInce they didnt allow enlisted to join until a few years ago , its extremely doubtful he did.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Two within the last 30 years. Both officers with one being Army and another a Naval aviator. </p>
<p>Good for them. How long were they in? Tell them to join USAA. Wonderful benefits.
Now do you have any personal, direct experience with the military and with usaa? Since I suspect the answer is no, I am happy to provide you with the timeline of when they opened up their enrollment to non officers. Its on their website-- but it requires a members access and password.
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I didn’t mean it as a crack and find it odd you took it that way. Especially when I asked whether I overlooked something.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Not sure about the cousin in the Army. Navy aviator cousin was RIFed sometime in the late '90s after serving less than 8 years. </p>
<p>The military was in need of warm bodies in the late 90’s,. RIF’s were predominantly in the early 90’s, after the first gulf war in '91. If an officer was honorably discharged, or didn’t re-up in the late 90’s, it was commonly because they were passed over for a promotion, so took an early discharge incentive.</p>
<p>(And please don’t bicker over the fact that the gulf war was officially mid '90 to early '91. It was desert storm in '91)</p>
<p>So back for the last time to the discussion of USAA,. They are Hq’d in San Antonio, but have a large office in Tampa. It would be an unfortunate irony if the shooter was served in any way by the victim’s wife.</p>