<p>“This is a WILDLY IDEALISTIC message, the kind of good news SIMPLY TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. It is, truth be told, a RECIPE FOR ANARCHY…inherently IMMUNE to scholarly SKEPTICISM”</p>
<p>Using this, I still think it’s dismissive. He never really gives it much ground in the real world, but only a fictional world, and the only way he gives it much weight is in the rhetorical sense. He also cites them as irreconcilable ideas. He never states that the idea can work, as it is impossible in the real world. He never explicitly states that it can’t work in today’s world, which would imply that it may someday. He outright says it can never work and that its only merit lies in the rhetorical sense.</p>