<p>
</p>
<p>See this interesting post on peer assessment scores:
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-search-selection/412606-how-calculate-universities-peer-assessment-score.html?highlight=predict+peer+assessment[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-search-selection/412606-how-calculate-universities-peer-assessment-score.html?highlight=predict+peer+assessment</a></p>
<p>See posts #1 and #9.</p>
<p>Edit:
</p>
<p>If I’m remembering the same letter, then you’ve changed the words around a little. As I remember, he said there’s an argument for Berkeley being in the top ten or so (which there certainly is). But, as I’m sure most would agree, there’s also an argument for HYPSMC, Columbia, Brown, Penn, Chicago, Northwestern, Duke, Dartmouth, Rice, Emory, WashU, and JHU for being ranked up there, too. I agree that Berkeley can be a great place for undergrads, but I disagree with your absolutism in insisting Berkeley is “top-10” for undergrads.</p>
<p>Edit #2:
Why do all threads in the Stanford forum seem to turn in to Berkeley discussions after you post?</p>