You are spot on. The problem is that Middlebury has people beating down its doors to get in. So the leadership takes the âlazyâ approach and just increases enrollment and/or tuition.
Cutting costs involves disappointing people and doing real work. They want no part of that if they can avoid it.
And it isnât just Middlebury. It is human nature. This happens everywhere.
In support of Union, its science facilities are quite remarkable at this time:
Prospective applicants and students who plan on studying in the sciences may benefit ftom considering this characteristic when researching Union.
Since this thread is about Middleburyâs financial situation, some might be interested in knowing that Midd just had one of its best fundraising years ever, bringing in over $100M.
Is that all going to endowment? I assume that a chunk of it will be allocated to capital projects.
Iâm not certain how it gets allocated, although the press release did have some info (e.g.,$20 million will go toward new endowed funds to support financial aid).
Schools with solely an undergrad enrollment - like Middlebury - are highly dependent on tuition to pay operating expenses. What other choices do they have other than to accept more students - specially at a school where applicants are beatin down the doors to get in th schools which are really in trouble are the other undergrad focused colleges which donât have a surplus of quality applicants.
Feels similar to Wesleyanâs current capital raise (which incidentally is also $600 million).
I think much of that is going to the many capital projects they have been doing, other money to current programs, etc. and a relatively small amount to endowment/fin aid.