Detailed report on UW admissions-2006

Colleges & Universities University of Wisconsin
1

<p><a href=“http://registrar.wisc.edu/st_plan/form_files/2006%20DEM%20Annual%20Report%20Admissions.pdf[/url]”>http://registrar.wisc.edu/st_plan/form_files/2006%20DEM%20Annual%20Report%20Admissions.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

2

<p>The amount the average ACT has risen between 1997 and 2006 inclusive isn’t even statistically significant…</p>

3

<p>The mean has gone up from 26.4 to 27.6
There may not be enough data to determine statistical significance but I agree the data does not pass the “eyeball” significance test!</p>

4

<p>I thought these were last years statistics…</p>

5

<p>yes they are from last year…it is too early for the 2007 numbers…</p>

6

<p>Good, just wanted to confirm</p>

7

<p>That’s a gain of about 50 points on the old SAT scale (1600). I’d rather be going up over a point than down one. Also with that large a sample size it seems going from about the 88th %tile to the 92nd% is a solid jump. Rumor has it this year’s average is up another point or so moving to the 94th %tile on avg.</p>

8

<p>Holy moly…look at the UM class of 2006
90% of the 2006 class graduated in the top 10% of their high school class!!! (Only 57% for Wiscy)…</p>

<p><a href=“U-M Web Hosting”>U-M Web Hosting;

9

<p>But only about 55% reported rank to UM so…inflated</p>

10

<p>Why would Michigan report a deceptively incomplete stat like that? does not make sense…after all they <em>are</em> the Harvard of the midwest…</p>

11

<p>lol to the sarcasm above… I think…</p>

<p>I cannot find the link to this, but in one year on US News, they went from ~60 to ~90% in the top 10%. With a substancial amount not being ranked and this rather strange jump, I’m not sold on those stats for UM.</p>