<p>PlantMom:</p>
<p>That’s one of the $40,000 questions.</p>
<p>If sugar is a contributor to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, would other carbs be harmless without the sugar?</p>
<p>Yudkin was asking that question 40 years ago. We still have no idea because, for 40 years, all of the research money was spent trying to prove that eating fat is linked to heart disease. The research on dietary factors contributing to insulin resistance has simply not been done and trying to do it was a career-killer. Basically the stuff of crackpots.</p>
<p>My guess, putting 2 and 2 together is that there is a genetic component to all of this. Some of us are more or less likely to develop insulin resistance or develop it to different degrees.</p>
<p>Without insulin resistance (aka being “young”) we can handle all the carbs we want. Eat carbs, a little insulin is release, body responds instantly. When we become insulin resistant, the problems start because eating the carbs keeps our insulin levels high all day and high insulin levels over time cause all kinds of problems – not the least of which is making us store body fat.</p>
<p>It seems quite likely that sugar (actually the fructose in sugar) is the dietary factor in insulin resistance. Yudkin noted in the 1960s that increased triglycerides (the almost universal marker of insulin resistance) appear in weeks after increasing sugar consumption (even in young people) and go down again within weeks after cutting sugar.</p>
<p>But, it sure would be nice to have seen science look at this stuff for the last 40 years, especially since the last gasp effort, the recent Women’s Health Initiative Study, was probably the final nail in the coffin of studies attempting to show some correlation between eating fat and heart disease. That’s pretty much officially a dead end as far as research goes.</p>
</p>
He does recommend her videos, though. And I scored extra points by being familiar with her already)</p>