<p>Leal, have you read the Popular Mechanics piece? Perhaps this would help you. <a href=“http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html[/url]”>http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html</a>
I don’t agree with your premise that there were discrepancies in the “story.” I believe that a catastrophic event is MESSY and this was certainly a catastrophic event. I’m not sure why you feel compelled to even research the 9/11 collapses (global warming, sure, because there is so much still to learn) and that in itself, is bizarre to me. I was, perhaps, unkind in the use of the term “whack job,” but your earlier posts were much less measured than the current one. I’m sorry that you are offended by my use of the word “delusional,” but that is what your posts say to me and I stand by that. Feel free to flame me if you’d like, that is certainly your right.</p>
<p>I would still be interested in learning what motive you think anyone other than terrorists would have to conspire to kill so many people and destroy those buildings. Also, why do you think they chose 7WTC to destroy and not the grotesque Deutsche Bank building which still stands in all of its monstrosity? I drive past the pit on the way home from work and I can’t even begin to imagine why any American would want to do what was done.</p>