<p>Though my situation may be exceptional it goes to show that there is obviously something that is weighted more heavily than grades when looking to form a class at any university and especially one like Stanford which looks for more than grades. I agree we must be realistic when providing advice to individuals but I also think that telling kids they need to have scores of 2200 and a ridiculous amount of awards is also not very helpful since Stanford sees thousands of kids with those credentials every year. I just simply do not agree with what you seem to refer to as Stanford’s averages. Though the majority of students at the university were able to receive some of the best test scores in the nation when it comes down to it they were chosen for something besides grades and thus I am inclined to believe from what I have discussed with my fellow peers at Stanford that people are chosen here for what they do outside the classroom and the influence and characteristics they bring while the grades serve as a way of knowing they at least have the raw intellect to succeed. </p>
<p>I’m just curious as to what your credentials are to be able to speak about college admissions to prospective Stanford students?</p>