Do I have a shot

<p>Hey I took the Jan sat as a senior and I improved my scores significantly, so I’m wondering if my chances will be different.
Race: Indian
Gpa: 3.9 wgpa: 4.49
Sat single sitting- 800cr 740m 790wr (2330)
Sat superscore-800cr 780m 790wr (2370)
I took it 4 times
Lowest score was 2240
Aps- 5-chem 5- calc bc 5-us history 5-stat
Sat2s- 800 math 2 800 chem 760 us history
Extracurriculars-
Chess club-president
Business club-president
Winter track spring track and xc (jv)
Founded chess and sat tutoring group at library
Harvard ssp
National honors society
Math honors society
Ap scholar with honor</p>

<p>Chance me for
Brown
Cornell
Columbia
Dartmouth
Harvard
Princeton
Yale
Stanford
Carnegie Mellon
Duke
Unc</p>

<p>Having higher SAT scores does not always increase your chances of admission to a top college. Much depends on other factors, such as what your teachers write about you in their recommendation letters, your guidance counselor’s SSR report and your essays. See: [A</a> Great Year for Ivy League Schools, but Not So Good for Applicants to Them - New York Times](<a href=“A Great Year for Ivy League Schools, but Not So Good for Applicants to Them - The New York Times”>A Great Year for Ivy League Schools, but Not So Good for Applicants to Them - The New York Times)</p>

<p>“Harvard turned down 1,100 student applicants with perfect 800 scores on the SAT math exam. Yale rejected several applicants with perfect 2400 scores on the three-part SAT, and Princeton turned away thousands of high school applicants with 4.0 grade point averages. Needless to say, high school valedictorians were a dime a dozen.”</p>

<p>. . . And that was 5 years ago, in 2007!</p>

<p>BTW: I think you need to do your due-diligence and narrow down your list of schools. To wit: Columbia and Brown are complete polar opposites, even though both play in the same athletic conference. A student who feels at home at one, may not be happy at the other.</p>

<p>Columbia, for example, prides itself on its Core Curriculum, where every student, regardless of major, is required to take the same basic set of courses: Masterpieces of Western Literature, University Writing, Frontiers of Science, Contemporary Civilization, Music Humanities and Art Humanities. All first and second year students must take these specific courses – the theory being that it gives all Columbia graduates a shared commonality and conversation. The core is not for everyone – students either love it or hate it. </p>

<p>Brown, on the other hand, has a complete open curriculum; students can take whatever classes they want, with no core requirements. Once you declare a major though, you must fulfill those classes to get a degree.</p>

<p>Brown - yes
Cornell - yes
Columbia - maybe
Dartmouth - yes
Harvard - no
Princeton - no and no (harder than Harvard)
Yale - maybe
Stanford - no
Carnegie Mellon - yes
Duke- yes
Unc - can’t compute</p>

<p>^Brown is by no means automatic. If I had to guess, I would say “no.”</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>What do you mean? They’re going to reject him twice? LOL.</p>

<p>FYI.
Being president of clubs is not really a good EC unless it is student government. Founding a tutoring group is ok.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>You’re right…it’s horrible. Colleges hate to see kids take leadership positions at their school!!111 [/sarcasm]</p>

<p>You’re right…it’s horrible. Colleges hate to see kids take leadership positions at their school!!111 [/sarcasm] </p>

<p>Not at the school at the club.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Uh, leadership positions in school clubs are a dime-a-dozen in elite school admissions. They might actually be interested if you did something with it. That is, if you were president of the key club and you raised $1000 for something… </p>

<p>However, being president of clubs alone is kind of like resume’ filler for something as difficult as Harvard admissions.</p>