<p>I know all the colleges say that they will look at your highest scores in each section of the SAT. However, I can’t help but think that this is not true. I think it is in their best interest to officially record your superscore (it makes their standards a lot higher) but I think they still will hold it against you if your scores fluctuate by at least + or - 30 pts. At the very least, somebody who does it best in one sitting will have a notch higher than the guy who superscored the same total. Does anybody agree or disagree? This is important to me because I lost 30 points on math the second time around but improved my superscore by 40 points.</p>