<p>You fail to make logical sense.</p>
<p>Your Claim:
You’re claiming that people risk more and are thus more dedicated because they’re transfers.
Because freshmen don’t face that risk, they are less dedicated.
Because transfers are more dedicated hence they are more qualified.</p>
<p>My Counter Claim:
Transfers fail to complete their prereqs because they are not dedicated.
Thus, even according to your logic, transfers are not more qualified.</p>
<p>My Claim:
Continuing students who do apply are already the cream of the pack because they did well in the weeder classes and their pre-reqs.
Thus, they are more qualified as a whole because only the best apply.
Of the best, only 50% gets in.
Hence the 50% admissions rate is deceiving.</p>
<p>I don’t see how my claim does not fail to refute your claim…
And I fail to see how your counter claims refute my claims?</p>