Ugh, I’ll say again that the “you” in the sentence @juillet quotes above was specific to the OP, not a colloquial version of the general, nonspecific “one.” Of course, economics is not business or finance (although one can make it a lot about finance by choosing courses carefully). But the OP pretty clearly indicated that his or her interest in economics was to get a job in consulting or finance, and that he or she didn’t find actual economics very interesting. I suspect the OP resembles a majority of today’s economics majors in that respect, given the popularity of the major relative to the opportunities in the world to be a practicing economist and the difficulty of qualifying for them. But I didn’t mean to suggest that economics = business.
Regarding social science and math: My children were in social science masters programs at different universities at the same time, and of course both had to take some version of Statistical Methods for Social Sciences. At University A, the text for the course was a user manual for SPSS, and the students learned which buttons to push to make the software do this or that. At University B, the course was entirely proof-based, covering the math underlying the software packages, and was preceded by a two-week Linear Algebra boot camp for everyone who could not pass a competency test. I suppose it’s an open question which course served the interests of its students better and/or more efficiently.