Sorry for the lack of clarity. Comes of trying to do things too quickly! The NY Times data source that I cited ranked colleges and universities by the gap between how many of their students came from the top 1%, versus the bottom 60%. This was used as a proxy for talking about economic diversity and wealth on campuses. I think it was around 38 schools that had more from the top 1% than the bottom 60%. The ranking continued on, however after around no 38 it was negative numbers (ie, more students from the bottom 60% than top 1%).
For many of the elite private schools, and a handful of publics, students in the bottom 60% of national income are heavily subsidized with financial aid.
In that data set, from 2017, W&L was no. 3 in the US in the size of their gap. Of the schools in this thread, Rhodes was “the bottom” at no. 68.