<p>No, I’d say those SAT ranges look pretty accurate. For CR/writing, the lower numbers in Pratt’s ranges are only 10 points higher than those for Trinity, while the higher numbers are the same. The higher math scores make sense because, well, it’s engineering.
As for being higher than MIT’s range, middle 50% for MIT 2006 admits were 670-770 CR, 730-800 M. So there’s actually not a huge difference - 20ish points. But then, MIT is super mathy/sciencey, so I guess being a mathcamp, USAMO, Intel ISEF semifinalist, science journal-published, cancer-curing applicant kind of offsets the importance of SAT scores.</p>