<p>No, they just destroy the legal property of others including critical research facilities housing a lifetime of work for some people.</p>
<p><a href=“http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/24095_fire22.shtml[/url]”>http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/24095_fire22.shtml</a></p>
<p>Oh, its not corporation pulluting my air, my water, rivers, having working conditions that are bad, having basically slave labor in US territories, hiring children to work at $1 a day.;…</p>
<p>Wonder what those people should be called then</p>
<p>Didn’t know you owned so much property. Speaking of the corporations, lets pull them from Vietnam and Bangladesh. That way, the people won’t work for slave wages, and they can praise the humanist liberals here in the states for such good work.</p>
<p>garland - thanks for the information - I was citing a definition used in a previous ELF case that was actually pre- Sept 11. I did not realize so many new definitions had popped up.</p>
<p>That name has been commonly used since the 80’s. Get over it.</p>
<p>How Orwellian of you, Barrons.</p>
<p>It is just a fact. Feel free to try to rewrite history to suit your needs. However don’t expect others who have been around more than a few years to swallow that bilge.</p>
<p>Re-write history? You’ve definitely lost me there. Using the world “terrorism” in this way is a political act, for however long it’s been done, not in any way reflecting any actual event that has ever happened. But if you repeat the word over and over…like I said, very Orwellian.</p>