<p>But the effect of the false data was not involved at all in posts 48, 49, 52 and 53. Clearly post 48 could (and should) have been a new thread. Even arguing about it has nothing to do with the thread as titled. I was just trying to get the discussion to either go back to its stated purpose, or to have it end if, as Bernie states, it is all talked out. After all, if you were someone looking for a discussion about what Oxford’s stats are and how they are changing, would you click on this thread given its title? I wouldn’t have.</p>