Thank you for disclosing that you have never taken a literature class and that your perspective on topics such as the insignificance of humans or “good” and “bad” are confined to your understanding of the natural world.
If you were to, say, debate a theologian on some of these points, what arguments would you use to prove that “good and bad” are no more than human/social constructs? Your statement is so confidently-delivered that I’m concluding you presented it as fact. What facts would you rely on? Or am I misinterpreting and you have merely expressed your subjective opinion?