<p>socaldad, your ad hominem attack is way out of line.</p>
<p>You invited confusion by repeatedly directing readers to “read between the lines.” I following your directive to a “t” while reading your several posts about your daughter’s successful application for Texas residency. </p>
<p>As you can see from the conversation here, it’s only natural that, when left to their own devices, readers will reach different conclusions. </p>
<p>Consequently, before forming my own conclusion, I thought it only fair to simply ask you to clarify the loophole.</p>
<p>As you’ve declined, here are a couple of lines with your words between them:</p>
<hr>
<p>"my company hired a local temp agency to employ my d. They issued her a weekly local paycheck. This gave the supporting documentation that she was in Texas. It was also the basis for her texas based tax return. So technically, she was employed last summer.</p>
<p>In actuality, she could have been anywhere. The temp agency was merely a conduit. Read between the lines."</p>
<p>and</p>
<h2>“read between the lines… Meaning that one could be employed by a texas company whether they lived their or not.”</h2>
<p>Thanks for the wishes, enjoy your day, too.</p>