<p>I certainly understand this and have been involved in the process. I see exam results also, and my point is that in the case of a subjective test like a refraction, at times it is not 100% accurate. Seeing the results, like a refraction or vision test, does not mean it is correct. It may be, in which case there has to be some reason he is not 20/20 and Larry Mullen can then be the definitive answer and tell him why he can not see 20/20. But we don’t know otherwise from what the candidate originally posted.</p>
<p>If you were told your eye exam was not normal, wouldn’t you want to find out what the problem was? The candidate can certainly speak to Larry Mullen, but I would still want to talk to a health care professional who actually gives the exam and inquire as to what the problem is. It didn’t sound like the candidate knew what his problem was, which was the whole point of my discussion. </p>
<p>This is less about trying to end run the system, but about finding out as much as one can about any medical/health problems they may have and have to deal with in the future, whether they go into the military or not. DODMERB does a fantastic job, but they are there to help determine whether candidates are medically fit/qualified for the military, not to follow up and treat any diagnosed abnormalities or problems.</p>
<p>I think we are stating points on two separate issues. One is to find out whether you have a problem or not. The other is whether or not you will qualify.</p>
<p>I still think its possible that the refraction could be incorrect (my opinion based on experiences and the very minimal information supplied by the candidate). Happens not infrequently. If that is the case, there is no problem, and therefore, not visually disqualified.</p>
<p>Candidate needs more information. Nothing wrong with calling Larry Mullen. I, however, would also go to an eye care professional who will talk to me and have them answer all of my questions as to my vision after they examine me.</p>