<p>“BTW Baelor you make it seem like selfishness is bad. It seemed like your the only one in the world that do stuff that’s not your own gain.”</p>
<p>Uh, I’m not the only one who cares about other people. Tons of people do things that are right and don’t benefit themselves. Surprisingly, most of the kids who do community service work extensively won’t report much of it. There are tons of examples of selfless people. Selfishness when it starts to affect things like honesty and integrity is bad. Who knew?</p>
<p>“HAve you ever compete for a job against another applicants? God isn’t that selfish. Thinknig only about yourself and not the other applicants. There are many acts of selfishness.”</p>
<p>What on earth are you talking about? These situations aren’t comparable at all. Getting a job honestly isn’t morally wrong. What is wrong with you?</p>
<p>“If you have a job, are you doing it for yourself? Would that be selfish? According to you as long as you want to gain something from doing it but would not do it for free then it is selfish.”</p>
<p>No, NOT doing something because you don’t benefit from it is selfish. Posters kept saying, “You don’t gain anything from it, don’t do it.” How on earth is that not selfish?</p>
<p>“PROVE that his life and his family’s will be at risk? are you kidding me? have you even heard of the witness protection program?”</p>
<p>No, FIRST, before even claiming that his family is in danger, PROVE that it is at all reasonable that the culprit will see through the completely coherent and likely story of the administration that doesn’t mention the tip at all. Once the guy knows something is up, PROVE that he will correctly know it was the OP. Then PROVE he is in danger. Many levels, yes? I find the conclusion that you are making incredibly far-fetched. Unless, of course, this child is truly a genius and capable of strategic thinking that only characters in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms possess.</p>
<p>“obviously its for offenses much more severe than cheating (which isnt even a crime), but they still relate. the feds dont KNOW that the witness who turned in the drug lord will get harmed.”</p>
<p>HELLO? WITNESS protection program? That means they SAW the incident. This kid won’t even know there was a “witness” at all if the administration doesn’t mention they got a tip.</p>
<p>“i guess we should do away with the program then according to your logic, right? who are you to determine how dangerous a person is?”</p>
<p>Read my posts, yes? I’m not doubting that the kid will be ****ed and might be a danger. I’m saying there’s a chance, but violent retaliation is still iffy in my opinion. The difference here is that he would have to correctly guess that the administration is covering up a tip that they got, and then he would have to deduce that the OP did indeed give the tip. Versus believing that the administration caught the error when the teachers and GC were talking. The first scenario is SO much more likely, I’m sorry.</p>
<p>“1) stay anonymous. it looks like the OP has stayed anonymous thus far, but if the OP wsa the only guy the cheater confessed to, then thats bad.”</p>
<p>The kid won’t even know there was a tip. That’s the thing.</p>