<p>Where did Shogun say waste? Was it the same place in the article where it said majority? Talking about making up ***** to go on a diatribe.</p>
<p>As for your next paragraph, just because some wars are just, does not mean all wars are just. After WWII sand 9/11 and the subsequent invasion of Afghanistan many people enlisted. After the start of Vietnam and Iraq, enlistment rates went down. See a trend. I do. People do not want to SACRIFICE when they do not see it neccesary. </p>
<p>Many people object to military recruiters because of the way they target low-income youth while high-income neighborhoods are barely combed through. Don’t get any ideas about playing the left-right card you can bet your Bible there’s a strong correlation between wealth and what side of the political spectrum you are on. Those rich neighborhoods are also very Republican neighborhoods. Bush the draft-dodger is a nice example. (I know, Clinton was too, but you get the point).</p>
<p>Ah, War is not always the answer. What Monsters! Can’t we hang them?</p>
<p>Those who have trumpeted against the war are no different from those who trumpeted for the war like the propoganda machine of Fox News. But the better side wins as the 2006 elections show.</p>
<p>On a side note, get off the Kool-Aid. Wasn’t it always the left that was accused of trying to use the military for nation-building, social engineering, and genocide prevention. Wasn’t it the right that was the pragmatic bunch that only believed in fighting when there was a clear and present danger to OUR LIVES? That doesn’t hold water when it comes to Iraq. As Chris Rock said, If Saddam was so damn dangerous how come we took over the whole country in three god-damn weeks. You couldn’t even take over Baltimore in 3 weeks.</p>