<p>yeah, that counts. i dont know if filled up = 12 though.</p>
<p>but hopefully i get at least 10 or more.</p>
<p>Well, that’s what other CCers have said. I specifically tried to fill up my 2 pages as well as possible. I took this test in middle school (im a junior now) and my essay was like half a page! Pathetic, yeah, but I got an 8! (not bad, huh?)</p>
<p>i agree, “arrived to” is the correct idiomatic expression</p>
<p>for the interview one, consider this:</p>
<p>It is debatable whether it should be arrive for or arrive to.</p>
<p>But it is certain that he “had run desperately” not “he had ran desperately”. </p>
<p>Therefore, the answer is “had run” and “arrive for” must be correct.</p>
<p>I asked this before, but I’m going to ask it more time to get a better response. In the 10th section, there was a question that said something about -</p>
<p>Alongside the path… something about a line of trees. </p>
<p>was a line of trees
or there was a line of trees?</p>
<p>Also…
“Hmm the obstinacy/determination one was the one with the director and the stage crew. I picked E for that one…”
Anyone?</p>
<p>wrong: bacteria even more resistant
because they are not compared with others (just resistant) which are killed - no parallel.</p>
<p>That’s what I said, rb. While one part seemed debatable, the other was CLREALY wrong, so I chose that one.</p>
<p>“runs a line of rugged trees”, I think. I may have mistakenly chosen something similar but different.</p>
<p>but the answer was
cause even more resilient strands to develop</p>
<p>can’t the more refer to the number of strands?</p>
<p>
No, this one had an error… I forget the sentence, but it basically said that the cell phones were pressing buttons or something.</p>
<p>I had 2 LONG Writing Sections and the short writing section at the end.</p>
<p>does this mean that one of the writing sectinos was experimental</p>
<p>wut was the obstinacy/determination one?</p>
<p>determination</p>
<p>Wasn’t it about that captain? It was about his facial expression.</p>
<p>What was the answer for one of the question in Section 10 where it said like</p>
<p>Located in present day something, the ancient city of Putra <em>something</em> wealthy over 2000 years ago due to spice trades.</p>
<p>I was trying to decide between “has grown” or “grew” </p>
<p>What was the answer?</p>
<p>I put has grown but Not sure</p>
<p>i put grew…pretty sure thats right</p>
<p>I put grew >_< I wish I knew which one it was though!</p>
<p>btw how many No errors were there? I got like four.</p>
<p>I THOGUHT the bacteria one had “many good bacteria” in it and i didn’t think you could “count” bacteria so i circled that one…</p>
<p>for the ancient city of Petra, it was GREW.</p>
<p>it no longer exists, its an ancient city in present-day whatever. Has grown implies that it continues till today. that wouldnt make sense</p>