<p>duh. Another vitae-padding, refereed journal article or 10 generated from grandma’s conventional wisdom. Might we wonder the amount of the taxpayer-subsidized grant to confirm that …</p>
<p>Since the middle of the 20th century, higher education has become increasingly femininocentric (and away from its historical traditions of being male dominated). And thus the rules for success are designed best for those who are feminine or like-minded. </p>
<p>Conversely, as has been shown in many studies, even academic research, while it’s always best to have that union card degree and those who have such are most likely to make alot more $$ over their lifetimes and have more professional opportunity, there is little and no correlation betwee academic success and worldly success. In other words, good to have a sheepskin, but getting A’s vs. the gentlemanly C has little value in forecasting which student will have the greatest achievement … aside from (you can guess) … academic type pursuits. Being a professor, academic researcher, college pres.</p>
<p>And to unsna09mom’s possible point …</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07093/774705-361.stm[/url]”>http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07093/774705-361.stm</a></p>
<p>And as Jesus Christ and the Beatles affirmed, all we need is love. The right kind.</p>