<p>One of the very first messages that I posted on CC (back on the “old” CC board) talked about my breakfast meeting with a neighbor of mine who was the Dean of Admissions at a very selective LAC (<30% acceptance rate). I wanted to know the tricks of the trade, so to speak. I wanted to repost a bit about that meeting because I think it happened with my son and his exceptionally competitive program that he got admitted into.</p>
<p>My friend outlined the process in a very simple way: Applications fell into one of three categories: immediate rejects, certain acceptances, and then the vast majority into the “Perhaps” category. He said that blowing the top off the SAT scores was grounds for consideration into the certain acceptance pile. If the 25%-75% range is, for example, 1250-1390 and your app shows up with a 1540, that’s grounds for placing the app right in the Acceptance Pile, ASSUMING THAT THE OTHER ATTRIBUTES ARE IN LINE WITH THAT SCORE (EC’s, Essays, GPA, etc). And in many cases, that’ll be the case. (Note: I am NOT talking about the uber-selective ones like HYPS.)</p>
<p>But, the vast majority of apps will be in the Maybe category and will be examined and discussed in more detail by the Admissions Committee. But he told me something kind of funny: That if the committee starts to refer to the student with a nickname of some kind, then he could almost predict right at that moment that an acceptance will come. For example, supposed an app from a female whose major EC was studying bats - going into caves to do population surveys, doing a science fair project on identifying bats by the frequency of their echolocation sounds, writing her essay on experiences with bats, etc. At some point, an admissions counselor might refer to her as “Batwoman.” The nickname would stick, and others would use it. When that happened, that was a very good sign. I guess that the nickname signified that here was a person with an unusual interest, or a unique skill, or some hook (small h, not “Hook” as we usually use it) that made them stand out from the other applicants. </p>
<p>I thought that was an interesting observation and could explain why consistency across activities and awards was good to show on an application.</p>
<p>And that came back to me when my son came back from his interviews as a finalist for the program he went into. There was fierce competition, but he noticed that the interview was more of a recruiting pitch, and he also mentioned that he already had a nickname at the school (as a result of part of his portfolio of films). When he walked in the door for the interview, the professor said, “Aha, so you’re the Nickname-Guy!” (I don’t want to use the real nickname). And when they were giving him a tour later, he walked into a room with some others and overheard them whisper (to each other), “Isn’t that the Nickname-Guy over there?”</p>
<p>So maybe there’s something to that advice. But I don’t know exactly how one could “engineer” such a thing. Maybe by tying together the activities and awards and essay. Maybe the first sentence to start the essay ought to be: “They started calling me ‘Batwoman’ …”</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>