<p>Asked and answered. See your previous posts and my reply #31. Same answer. I can’t analyze how they came up with their “findings” when I’m given no access to the data. </p>
<p>Where is the data on positive versus negative citations on ratemyprofessor for each university? </p>
<p>They also didn’t include in the Forbes article any back up data for their interpretations of the Who’s Who data. How did they tally it? Did it include references only to UG college attendance — which it would have to to make it comparable to the USNWR rankings for UG, which they explicitly do compare. If the Who’s Who cites include references to grad school attendance, how can that be a valid measure against the USNWR rankings? </p>
<p>Sorry, but this ranking methodology is a mishmash of made-up info thrown together like a dog’s breakfast. I think Forbes has to try to explain it, not me. </p>
<p>Can we stop repeating ourselves now?</p>