<p>To me, that table has a lot of great information.</p>
<p>It makes me wonder what all is defined to be a member of what category, though. A number of the sciences seem to overlap- especially within the environmental sciences category (it’s essentially a mix of life, physical, and to a lesser extent, social sciences). </p>
<p>Not to mention, it divides the expenditures into category by major- but there were no environmental science majors at FSU in 2009; the programs didn’t start until the 2010-11 year. There was only the Environmental Studies program, which suggests to me that for that category, a number of majors are lumped into the environmental sciences group that may or may not belong. </p>
<p>It’s just things like that, where there seems to be no complete explanation for things, that kind of confuses me. It is, in my opinion, a very bad choice to divide the sciences up in the way that they did there.</p>