gifts for a prospective computer science major?

<p>For the OP:</p>

<p>Here is an article about getting started with Android development
[Getting</a> Started with Android Development | Jean Hsu](<a href=“http://www.jeanhsu.com/2011/05/03/getting-started-with-android-development/]Getting”>http://www.jeanhsu.com/2011/05/03/getting-started-with-android-development/)</p>

<p>The official developer site with loads of information, tutorials, the software one needs, etc. is
[Android</a> Developers](<a href=“http://developer.android.com/]Android”>http://developer.android.com/)</p>

<p>Basically, you go to developer.andoid.com and download a development environment that includes the necessary software, including a device emulator. So most development and testing is done on a regular computer with the emulator. The final step is to transfer it to a real device and test it there.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>You’d think that they would have made NT fully usable and administerable by command line in order to allow better multiuser capability and scriptable/documentable administration. But it was so GUI-dependent that administering it was a very manual process.</p>

<p>motherbear, I once again thank you. </p>

<p>ucbalum, wow. I truly didn’t understand one thing you wrote in post #22. That’s OK, you don’t need to explain :)</p>

<br>

<br>

<p>I imagine that there was a clash of cultures. I think that Cutler brought over the whole development team at Digital with him (Pacific Northwest) and I imagine that there was somewhat of a clash of cultures. Cutler seemed to VMSify a lot of the stuff under the covers. Yes, the DOS window still persists and you don’t have DCL in Windows - though I think that there were some shells to emulate parts of it.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>This…combined with Microsoft’s institutional resistance were probably major factors in why the various iterations of NT sucked from 3.1-4.0. Only when Win2k arrived did we finally have what could be considered a respectable stable workstation OS. </p>

<p>Even then, there was some backsliding as was the case with XP before SP2 & SP3 or <em>shudder</em>…Vista.</p>

<p>D1 complains that the comp sci lab is cold, and that a snuggie would be really useful. Hint hint. She also was very amused by the children’s book “Lauren Ipsum”, which presents comp sci concepts at a child’s (or clueless parent’s :wink: ) level.</p>

<p>A second, third or fourth monitor or a rack to mount multiple monitors. It sounds weird, but my MIT son and all his course 6 buddies had racks of monitors - one monitor for coding, one for compiling, one for web browsing, one for skype. Hardware is cheap, time is expensive!</p>

<p>Perhaps a good sized usb hard drive or a DAC to enhance music playback from computer. (Any future programmer will be suitably impressed by an audiophile geek purchase like a DAC. Just be ready to hear him rave about how much better his music sounds.)</p>

<p>[Digital-to-Analog</a> Converters at Crutchfield.com](<a href=“DAC: Digital-to-Analog Converters, External DACs, Audio DACs”>DAC: Digital-to-Analog Converters, External DACs, Audio DACs)</p>

<p>A motherboard with vacuum tubes :slight_smile: (they do make one with vacuum tubes in the audio section…)</p>

<p>It all depends on budget but In my view point as student iPad will be more excited gift.</p>

<p>regards,
<a href=“Pcmacexpress.com”>Pcmacexpress.com; (Computer Repair New York)</p>

<p>liquid-cooled i5 2500K overclocked to 4.8 Ghz. or a nice laptop with an SSD drive</p>

<p>get him a fast hard drive… preferably an SSD.</p>

<p>running a search on one of my codebases used to take up to a minute on my 5200RPM.</p>

<p>on my SSD its a matter of seconds.</p>

<p>compiling a large project used to take up to a minute as well… nowadays its also a matter of seconds.</p>

<p>over the course of his college career, hes going to be hitting search/compile hundreds of thousands of times. those minutes add up!</p>

<p>I love SSDs. My MacBook Pro as a 48 GB SSD for boot and application launching and a 1 TB HDD for large storage capacity. I am considering a 96 GB SSD for more SSD capacity unless Apple puts a retina display in their upcoming MBPs and then I will just upgrade. My old laptop is quite old now but the SSD has made it new again.</p>