<p>
I agree that Cornell should require the submission of standardized test scores, but I don’t believe that any more hurdles should be provided to transfer students than to high school seniors that apply, which seems to be the position taken throughout the thread.
Most high schools don’t rank their students. Only 45% of high schools report class [URL="<a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/05/education/05rank.html?pagewanted=all"]ranks[/URL">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/05/education/05rank.html?pagewanted=all"]ranks[/URL</a>], which puts the other 55% into the same boat as the community [URL=”<a href="http://www.nassp.org/Content.aspx?topic=61042"]colleges[/URL">http://www.nassp.org/Content.aspx?topic=61042"]colleges[/URL</a>].
I agree that different schools possess different admission philosophies, just as different businesses possess different hiring practices, but I, at the same time, find it doubtful that either an employee or a random citizen has a better grasp of how Microsoft should do its hiring than a human resource specialist that actually possess a track record. There’s definitely a wrong way to make such decisions.
I certainly am implying that a community college student with a 3.9 GPA is just as, if not more qualified than a student from a no-name, inner city high school with the same GPA. Do you have any reason to believe otherwise? I’d be extremely interested in reading it.
So far I’ve seen no logical refutation to the point, other than the circular argument that it’s absurd because it’s absurd. Although you never stated that “community college students are idiots” it’s certainly implied and all but hammered down throughout the remaining portion of your post.</p>