<p>I obviously meant it in the sense of including intent to deceive, since it was tied to conspiracy theory which has a well accepted shading to it. As I said before, this is way off point now, and you are not at all helpful.</p>
<p>Puffery does not apply here because that goes to descriptors such as “best ever” or “get’s spots out like magic”. These were concrete results for a well defined set of people. It was possible to do this because as opposed to a law class of hundreds, we are looking at a very small group of people every year per school. It does not guarantee anything for anyone else, of course. Like I said, though, I like the odds based on these past results. It has nothing to do with them being wonderful jobs, because I don’t even know what that means. What is wonderful for you might be awful for me. I only know at this point that every person in those programs that wanted a job when they finished got one, and the firms/hiring entities and positions they related to me sounded very solid. There really isn’t much more to be said. I am sorry you are so miserable with your life choices, Mr. Skinner.</p>