<p>This is my first post…Yay!</p>
<p>Stats:
F, Caucasian, 31</p>
<p>I graduate this semester with a BS in cell and Molecular biology, with a Psychology minor from a small domestic public university.
Overall GPA 3.65
in major 3.85
in minor 3.9
I started research in my first year, have three poster presentations, and a talk at undergraduate conferences. I am 2nd author on a submitted paper. </p>
<p>I am a poor test taker, and though I have developed strategies that I can use when taking a paper test (i.e., double checking your answers) these don’t work in a computer test situation, therefore my GRE scores came out about average. V:550 (75) Q:560 (40) AW 4.5 (63). </p>
<p>I have strong LOR’s from professors in my department that have worked closely with me in lab, both independently, and in-class and have observed me at conferences. </p>
<p>I have applied to 5 PhD programs in Neuroscience: Harvard, UM-ann arbor, UW-seattle, OHSU, and Wayne state.</p>
<p>My applications were completed in late October, after attending SFN to meet and mingle with students currently in my programs of interest.</p>
<p>What I learned was disconcerting, and I wanted to bring it up here for discussion: Seems that with the recession, universities are accepting approximately half as many students. and keeping to very limited research interests. </p>
<p>My question is, Is this true? Is there anyone currently in a program that knows something about this? Or is this just the general milieu of paranoia and fear we are steeped in coloring our perceptions?</p>