“anomander: Who even uses 2 spaces anymore? I was surprised that 1/3 of the study participants used two spaces, given they were college kids IIRC. I’d only expect that from people who originally learned on typewriters. I do also think using a fixed-width font very likely affected the results”.
Everyone who learned from someone who began typing back in the day, that’s who. My college kids learned to type this way and did so until demanded to change in certain settings by some people who don’t know how to do it correctly.
It looks so weird. Sorry. Sticking to the two spaces.
Who goes back and rereads posts they already read to check for edits? Not me because CC takes you to where you left off but sure, you brought it up first.
I jokingly tell my students that there are really only two grammar things I’ll knock them down for: using an apostrophe when it isn’t needed and not using an oxford comma. They must believe me though because they rarely make the mistake in their papers.
After reading this thread, I should really add my third pet peeve: using “anymore” without a negative in the sentence.
Anyway, something interesting:
What any annoying font…
A lot of my proposals and abstracts are character based rather than word or page length. Extra spaces add up quickly
Two spaces, check. Oxford comma, check. Parallel construction, mandatory. Legislatures are notorious for bad grammar, @skieurope, but in that example, shipment and distribution are parallel, which is how I would read the sentence (although then, I will admit, there is a missing conjunction before packing).
Just looked up what an “Oxford comma” is. Had never heard of it. Placed into Honors college lit class eons ago. Was taught no comma before the and, done it that way forever. Dislike it despite its removal of ambiguity in some cases. I will NOT use it!
btw- pet peeve of mine (among many) is the misuse of its and it’s. Just mentally see if you mean it is…
However, in that case, shipment and distribution are not supposed to be parallel; packing and distribution are supposed to be parallel. At least that was originally meant, and why the law was since revised to read: