Oh I didn’t mean it that way. I was thinking that there may be generational differences in priorities and views among the alum population.
I was thinking that a board member who is 35 years old may have very different views than a board member who is 60
It would be interesting to see if elected alum board members tend to skew younger than nominated board members because that may mean that elected board members may reflect the generational priorities of their voters and may tend to push the board and the university in a different direction?