<p>That is the undergraduate program ranking while #5 is the graduate program ranking. I am extremely skeptical of survey-based rankings, and while I could see how people might be able to somehow crudely rank graduate programs based on their general impressions of research output from each school (from their readings of literature in their fields and attendance at conferences, etc.), I have difficulty imagining how they could rank undergraduate programs unless they are provided with objective data about each program given that research output is not (and shouldn’t be) the most important determinant of the quality of undergraduate program.</p>