This is the second time I’ve composed a post while the OP was writing hers, in which she ended up answering something I’d asked.
Hi, OP.
@karen0 wrote:
“DDs paper was 30 pages before endnotes. On almost 2 solid pages she used a secondary source instead of the primary source, but for one of the paragraphs she omitted a non scholarly source (she was not allowed to use). Regardless of how I feel, the consequence is a suspension (which they are not making her take), she will need to fill out the additional supplement in the CA, in will not be on her academic transcript. Her college councilor will write a letter supporting her as a great member of the school community, leader and student.”
I think this is the clearest description we’ve received so far (of both the offense and the consequence.) As I understand it now, there are three clear elements:
- she used a secondary, rather than primary, source for most of two pages of a 30 page paper.
- she used a prohibited non-academic source for one paragraph of the paper.
- she failed to cite the prohibited source.
These are the consequences, if I understand correctly:
- rewriting the paper this summer
- suspension, which she is not required to serve (is this because the year is ending?)
Institutional support, as described in this post and earlier, will include:
- counselor’s letter (is this separate from the counselor’s regular recommendation letter?) will include the support and praise described above
- faculty letter(s) noting that this is an aberration in DD’s otherwise excellent performance.
Are these facts all correct?
If so, I recommend 1) ensuring that DD has academic support as she moves forward to senior year (two/three hours of sleep per night for weeks indicates either executive function struggles or an academic mismatch — or both) and 2) really learning from this incident (one doesn’t accidentally use a prohibited research source; that’s a big deal) and 3) moving forward with any/all college applications DD originally intended, plus a few schools that appear to be “safeties” from the perspective of forgiveness of academic misconduct such as this. I’m not sure how to identify these schools, or whether CC members will be able to help, but I see that you’re already on the hunt for these and I support this effort.
Wishing only good things for DD’s future. It sounds like she was overwhelmed and exhausted, was sloppy about the secondary source, made a very bad (and serious) decision regarding the use of a prohibited source and the failure to cite it, but is an otherwise excellent student and, more importantly, is a good person.
If it were my child, I would encourage her to take the bull by the horns in the college application process, writing a supplemental letter of her own — directed to the Deans of Admission at the dream schools she now believes she might as well leave off her list because there is no hope. In my opinion, owning this mistake, in the most positive way possible, is the best course of action. I like the suggestion, made in a prior post, that she take on some community service within her school, especially involving younger students. Can she help with class sessions introducing young students to proper citation procedures, for example? Serve as a TA helping to verify sources submitted by kids in the early grades? Etc. Regardless of whether doing so has a positive effect on college admissions, DD moving past the shame of it all to actively owning it, to using the experience constructively to help others would be a wonderful evolution for DD.
@karen0, this is so tough, and it’s clear you’re doing your best to navigate the situation and to support your daughter. Keep your chin up. Hugs to you.