<p>dstark:</p>
<p>The laws of economics account for risk-taking behavior, and the laws of psychology account for socially-driven decision-making, and both of those account for the dotcom bubble. But that’s not the issue in question here.</p>
<p>When you quote rent increases and home price increases, you make my point for me. Rental costs cannot be higher than sales costs FOR COMPARABLE PROPERTIES because very, very few people would rent under those conditions. If I could buy a car for $300/month over three years and own the car at the end, or I could lease one for $330/month over three years and have nothing at the end, which would I do?</p>
<p>So, buying costs are the ceiling on what I can charge for rent. The other factors are supply and demand. As housing costs have skyrocketed, more and more people have scraped together enough money to get on what they hope will be the gravy train. Given declining property values in many cities in the recent past, they may be in for a shock. Or maybe not. We’ll see.</p>
<p>But the real issue is, “What is the desirability of renting vs. the desirability of buying?” THAT, is what drives what I can charge for rent. And it’s not hard to figure out what I can charge. All I have to do is look at some rental properties and look at what the owners are charging to understand my competition. And if my places don’t rent quickly, what do I do? I drop the price. And if I rent out in a day, what do I do? I raise the price.</p>
<p>This is not a hard business. The drivers are pretty straightforward. When interest rates drop, making buying less expensive, I can charge less rent. When they go up, I can charge more, because the cost of rent relative to the cost of buying declines.</p>
<p>Sure, there are some people with bad credit. There are some people who are stupid (though they are not usually so stupid that they can’t read the classifieds and pick the lowest rent for the best property). But the fact that there are outliers does not change micro or macroeconomic theory and practice.</p>
<p>Tax deductions? Not relevant, since they are part of the cost/benefit decision to buy or not buy. Don’t want to take care of a place? They can buy a condo.</p>
<p>Moving can sometimes have an impact. I have an old acquaintance in a small, Missouri town who owns some rental properties. Many people in this town work for a single company. This company transfers people a lot. When the company got rid of its policy of paying to sell employees houses and pay closing and selling costs on transfers, his rental rates shot up because so many employees don’t want to take the financial risk of paying for closing and selling costs.</p>
<p>So, that can happen. I’m not saying there aren’t some distortions in the marketplace. What I’m saying is that, barring some extraordinary evidence, I don’t buy that buying is cheaper (on a cash flow basis) than renting, or ever has been on a macro basis.</p>