<p>“I think north campus is just easier and good looking people are usually dumber.”</p>
<p>I don’t think there are too many dumb students at UCLA ;)</p>
<p>“I think north campus is just easier and good looking people are usually dumber.”</p>
<p>I don’t think there are too many dumb students at UCLA ;)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Complete BS</p>
<p>yeah, I’m just lying for the hell of it. it’s like evolution. complete bull because it doesn’t sound as great as some dude just appearing in a garden.</p>
<p>and I’m getting my mustache waxed now. ;)</p>
<p><a href=“Professional Psychological & Therapy Assessment Tools”>Professional Psychological & Therapy Assessment Tools;
<p>Ladies… BEHOLD!!</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1062524179-post17.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1062524179-post17.html</a></p>
<p>I hope everyone has clean underwear available, just in case.</p>
<p>Do you have any thoughts of your own or do your opinions mirror what you read in a pseudo scientific sociological paper?</p>
<p>That article is based entirely off of assumptions, doesn’t seem to know the difference between correlation and causation, and doesn’t acknowledge environmental influences. </p>
<p>Wow, if this is what Sociology research is, i hereby dub that a bull **** discipline.</p>
<p>I think I can almost see a chest hair in BMW’s first pic.</p>
<p>As for the intelligence/beauty thing, it does make some sense. Beauty and intelligence would often be attracted to each other as dominant traits. Of course it does not mean that the offspring will inherit one or both of these traits. There is also a huge difference between intelligence and knowledge. I contend that better looking people (often women) are less inclined to educate themselves because they think they are going to become “actresses” or “models” however it’s way to broad of a topic.</p>
<p>Yes, there is a difference. From other research I’ve read intelligence is not necessarily a predictor of success anyways. I agree with you about your good-looking women theory too, although maybe that is specific to LA…</p>
<p>Organicgreentea, why you gotta be player-hatin’? I don’t understand why anyone would get that upset over something like this. It’s a fascinating idea, because we live in a society where many people believe in an inaccurate idea of how karma works, and believe, in the end, the world is some great fair place where you get what you deserve.</p>
<p>I am incapable of thinking outside of my immediate environment. And the idea of karma is stupid. I think history has proven that.</p>
<p>Yes. That is what I was saying. Karma is about a cosmic sort of fairness, rather than an earthly “you get what you deserve thing”. </p>
<p>Okay, I’m done with everybody getting butt-hurt about inoffensive comments. I need to start drinking again, it’s a better use of my time.</p>
<p>+1 for Dr. Cox early morning habit.</p>
<p>I’m not player hating, you posted a half-assed theory and stated it as fact. I’m just trying to tell you your an idiot.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No, YOU’RE an idiot. </p>
<p>Someone failed English 21.</p>
<p>I do not see any business economics majors here
I will vote for business economics.</p>
<p>OMG! I didn’t see that someone posted my pics or found the link with my pics! Haha well now that they are out…what do you guys think? Hot or Not anthro guy?</p>
<p>I’d say, the hottest majors are northcampus, Art history, majors. Although, north campus is filled and filled with potential opportunities. South campus, the hotties are a bit more rare, my engineering friends got “south campus glasses” after 1-2 quarters.</p>
<p>you’re smokin’ ;)</p>
<p>ROFL.LOL.LMAO.</p>
<p>“that someone posted my pics…” being you? ;)</p>
<p>^ Ha! right? :D</p>
<p>no…that somebody posted my pics, being somebody else posted the link of a time a while back when i posted my backs. thanx</p>