<p>^ hahah confused.</p>
<p>Lol Uckittychen you’re right the title alone disqualifies this post from the uc transfer section. Interesting nevertheless</p>
<p>OP, </p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/transfer-students/[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/transfer-students/</a></p>
<p>I don’t think mediocre students can ever get into quant finance lol.</p>
<p>dude…you’re not going to get into an ivy league school. you should have taken your studies more seriously</p>
<p>
This is pretty unlikely. UCLA has like 26k undergrads right now and nearly 400k alumni. It seems unlikely that even if they did random testing, which i’d imagine that they don’t since it would be seen as unnecessary spending to do so, that one would get caught. Chances are, if you can get past the UC app, you’ll probably be fine from there after.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>If they don’t do it for current students, which they probably don’t, i highly doubt they do it for alumni. (for the same reasons mentioned for current students)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Even if they do this, it probably won’t be for years, and i doubt that they’d retroactively be trying to find students who long graduated and cheated on their applications.</p>
<p>I’m not saying he should lie on his application, i don’t think he should; but i also think all the hypotheticals you’re providing go contrary to occam’s razor.</p>
<p>^^^^ agreed</p>