How could they be written by the same author?

[Invoyable]

<p>

What I was saying, Invoyable, is that there’s a difference between a “bad book” and a “book I didn’t like.” While I recognize that Jane Eyre is a classic, I also don’t like it, but I would never be as bold or arrogant as to say it’s a “bad book,” because it’s clearly not. Just as, while “The Grapes of Wrath” may not fit your personal taste, it must be acknowledged that it is far from a bad book–some might say, one of the best books.

Your point? “Bad” is a subjective term. I can’t say for Grapes of Wrath because I’ve never read it (like a bajillion books) but Jane Eyre, I’ve read the first 10 pages. It was a bad book. Doesn’t matter if it’s a “classic” or any other of that utter bs. It’s all subjective.</p>

<p>I can say pokemon’s a good book, while some may not. Doesn’t matter.</p>

[INVENIAMVIAM]

<p>Yeah well, anybody who doesn’t agree with you that Pokemon is a GOOD BOOK is totally wrong. Duh.</p>

[IlDesi]

<p>Oh good, I’m not the only one that despises The End.
I was just ****ed when I finished reading it. The ending wasn’t really an ending at all…</p>

[Mapleleafs26]

<p>Franz Kafka:
The Metamorphosis - Good
The Judgment - So very odd</p>

[thelittlemermaid]

<p>I just have to say…that I hated The Grapes of Wrath. It’s not my kind of book. </p>

<p>Anyway,
J.K. Rowling:
Good: Harry Potter 2-7
Bad: Harry Potter 1
(sorry)</p>

<p>Alexandre Dumas
Good: Three Musketeers Series, Count of Monte Cristo
Bad: The Last Cavalier (not bad, but not as good by a long shot. Probably because it wasn’t finished.)</p>

[estrat1]

<p>Christopher Paolini…</p>

<p>Good: Eldest
Bad, but readible: Eragon
Absolutely horrible: Brisingr.</p>

[Muscovy]

<p>Frank Herbert
Good: Dune
Bad: the rest of the series… well, I think the second and third were alright, but they just went downhill. Stopped reading after #4, I think. </p>

<p>And seconding the OP about Silence of the Lambs and Hannibal.</p>