<p>Most families buy into the best school district they can afford when it comes to housing and kids. This way, there are no additional costs for tuition during k-12 years if the public school district is utilized. If the family is buying a house, there is definite added value to being in a school district with a good reputation. In our area, there are many homes, side by side but in two different school districts, and the value of the one in the better district is always much more valuable, all attributes equal and will tend to sell much more quickly. Also if a good education is part of your family values, you will be with other with the same philosophy. These areas tend to be the “good” parts of town every and anywhere. </p>
<p>However, sometimes a good school district may not be a good fit for a given child. That being the case, it’s easier to move out of desirable school district than one without a good rep. The problem is that moving is a big deal thing, not to do at the drop of ones hat. Also since better school districts tend to cost more, if you aim too high in costs in buying a house in one, it’s easier to get into trouble financially. And if you bought a house, it’s not simple to just leave it. You can also have several kids and some doing well in the district and others who are not. If you have leeway in your budget in living in a not so great district, it’s a bit easier to find a private option for those kids who don’t fit well in the public schools. If you are up to the whazoo in terms of budget and you have a kid who isn’t a good fit for the public school, you can’t afford to send him to a private option. </p>
<p>Also, your kids might not be the top kids in a top school district. I know a family who lived in a mediocre district when they could have moved after the first kid. But their kids were officers in Student Council, played varsity sports, got the top roles in the plays, were in the honors courses whereas the “hot” school district had so many kids competing for everything, that getting such plums were not easy pickings. The parents supplemented some of the academic experiences during the summer but let them really enjoy their school years at a school where things were more relaxed and there wasn’t a fight for every position. There is something to be said about that kind of experience. </p>
<p>I put mine in expensive private schools because they would not get to take the AP courses, do music and sports at our very good school district. I picked schools where all kids got those opportunities instead of having to compete for those spots. And you know what? They did just fine in them and learned high level material which was a big boon to them and me. Not in the public schools here would this have happened. Doesn’t do you any good to have all sorts of goodies in your schools when your kid can’t partake. Also do bear in mind that a B in top school does not always an A in a not top school make. There is a lot more to it than that. There are a number of kids in rigorous schools with steep grading curves that would have done better in terms of gpa and therefore, merit scholarship, honors college and some admissions opportunities particularly at formula state schools if they did not go to such top schools.</p>
<p>So until you know what you have in terms of a child and the fit even for k-12 schools, it’s not that easy to pick the perfect place. You do the best you can. Also bear in mind, if you are in flux about where to move, that having a good local college choice, preferably choices, can really make a difference if you are going to be on a tight budget. To live in an area where there is just one community college that isn’t so hot can be an issue. Federal funds for students, themselves to borrow (Staffords) make it possible for most all kids to go to local public options even if family funds can’t pay for college. But just like the k-12 schools, you are stuck with what is within commuting distance of where you live.</p>