But MIT says differently about the score bar, RichinPitt. One rep reflected on how they know anyone with a 7 in front “can do the work” at MIT. Then they look for a whole lot more. (This was before the new SAT, so expect a tad higher.)
It’s a mistake to focus on stats alone, as if. Yes, 630 in any math is low for many engineering progeams, because of the competition. But you haven’t even hinted at the targets or at the rest of what this kid will offer. Or not. GPA, rigor, math-sci ECs, collaborative stem activities, breadth, and more. Some hook wont make up for an incomplete whole record.
What sort of targets?