<p>
</p>
<p>I am no tax accountant, but I can certainly read :-). If you take a careful look at both links I provided, you will see that both deal with the same topic. In particular, here is the text at the top of the link whose relevance you question:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The link definitely does not “discuss reimbursement to employees for courses taken by employees”, as you imply. As far as preference for children of faculty members at elite universities, here is but one example that has stirred the pot:</p>
<p>[Golden</a> assails admissions preferences for the wealthy at bookstore talk - Campus News](<a href=“http://media.www.browndailyherald.com/media/storage/paper472/news/2006/10/02/CampusNews/Golden.Assails.Admissions.Preferences.For.The.Wealthy.At.Bookstore.Talk-2319118.shtml]Golden”>http://media.www.browndailyherald.com/media/storage/paper472/news/2006/10/02/CampusNews/Golden.Assails.Admissions.Preferences.For.The.Wealthy.At.Bookstore.Talk-2319118.shtml)
[The</a> Daily Princetonian - Reporter Golden blasts unfair legacy admissions](<a href=“http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2006/11/16/news/16620.shtml]The”>http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2006/11/16/news/16620.shtml)
[A</a> Review of The Price of Admission by Daniel Golden](<a href=“http://calitreview.com/2007/04/24/the-price-of-admission-how-americas-ruling-class-buys-its-way-into-elite-colleges-and-who-gets-left-outside-the-gates-by-daniel-golden/]A”>http://calitreview.com/2007/04/24/the-price-of-admission-how-americas-ruling-class-buys-its-way-into-elite-colleges-and-who-gets-left-outside-the-gates-by-daniel-golden/)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Here is another one from the WSJ with specific numbers.
[WSJ.com</a> - Many Colleges Bend Rules To Admit Rich Applicants](<a href=“http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Polk_Rich_Applicants.htm]WSJ.com”>http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Polk_Rich_Applicants.htm)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Let’s do some math with these numbers: 20/150=13% of admissions decision comes from such preference. The median SAT at Michigan is 1980, 13% of that is 256. Voila.</p>
<p>Yet more proof from the Chronicle of Higher Education:
[The</a> Chronicle: Colloquy Live Transcript](<a href=“http://chronicle.com/colloquy/2005/01/faculty/]The”>http://chronicle.com/colloquy/2005/01/faculty/)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Googling “admission preference for children of faculty” produces many, many, many more links with supporting data.</p>